Can a Tool Really Be Inhumane?
I want you to stop and think about something for a second. A tool has no heart. It has no soul. It takes no action on its own. A spoon is not inhumane — even though you could technically gouge someone’s eye out with one. But you could also use that same spoon to feed someone chocolate cake. The spoon doesn’t make that choice. You do.
I use that analogy because I’ve been there. I used to weigh 300 pounds. I had to lose 100 pounds, and I did it. But the spoon wasn’t the problem. I was the problem. The same logic applies to every single training tool in my bag.
I’ve been doing this since I was 12 years old. That’s when I used my first e-collar. I’m 50 now. In those 38 years, I’ve worked with tens of hundreds of thousands of dogs worldwide. I’ve seen what these tools do when they’re used correctly, and I’ve seen what happens when they’re misused. The tool is never the variable. The human always is.
What I Mean by Tactile Touch Tools
When I talk about training tools, I group a lot of them into what I call tactile touch tools — tools that communicate through physical sensation. That includes:
- Remote collars (e-collars, what some people call “shock collars”)
- Prong collars
- Standard leashes
- Gentle leaders and head halters
Used correctly, all of these do one thing: they deliver information. Touch is one of the clearest forms of communication a dog understands. Think about leash pressure — a gentle tug that guides direction, with the release of that pressure being the reward. The dog figures out fast: when I move with this, the pressure goes away. That’s clarity. That’s learning.
A remote collar works the same way. At the right level — and I want to be clear about this, because it matters — the stimulation from a properly used remote collar is often gentler than the vibration on your phone. I’m not overstating that. It’s a low-level tactile touch that gets the dog’s attention. Nothing more.
The “Shock Collar” Myth
Here’s the thing about the word “shock collar.” It’s chosen on purpose. It’s emotional language designed to trigger a reaction before anyone has actually thought it through. And it works, unfortunately, because a lot of people hear “electric” and their brain jumps straight to pain.
So let me walk you through what actually happens in a properly conducted session. Imagine I’m standing behind you and I poke you on the shoulder. Poke, poke, poke. You turn around and say, “What do you want?” That’s it. That’s the whole concept. I’m using touch to get your attention. I’m communicating. I’m not punishing you. I’m not hurting you. I’m saying, “Hey, look at me.”
Now if I walked up behind you and smacked you in the back of the head instead? That’s a different story. That’s a training failure. That’s what happens when someone goes too high, too fast, too soon — before the dog even knows what the sensation means. The answer to that isn’t to ban the tool. The answer is better education.
The same principle applies to prong collars and leashes. Any tool can be misused by someone who doesn’t know what they’re doing or someone with bad intentions. The car that kills someone on the road isn’t the problem. The person behind the wheel is.
Why This Debate Even Exists
I’ve thought about this a lot because I’ve been in the middle of it for a long time. In my view, there are three main reasons this fight keeps going:
- Fear. People fear what they don’t understand. When something is invisible and electronic, it feels more threatening than a visible leash — even when the reality is the opposite.
- Ignorance. And I mean that in the most neutral sense of the word — they simply don’t know. They’ve never used one. They’ve never watched a proper session. They’ve formed an opinion based on secondhand fear.
- Peer pressure and business interests. I’ve had veterinarians vote against allowing me into their college because of the tools I use. I’ve also had those same professionals come to me privately and say, “Please don’t tell anyone, but I need your help.” That’s not a values conflict. That’s peer pressure. And that’s a shame.
Proverbs 18:13 says that to answer before listening is folly and shame. I had to look up “folly” — it means foolishness, lack of good sense. And that’s exactly what’s happening in this debate. People are answering before they’ve listened. They’re judging tools they’ve never held, never used, and never studied in a real training context.
You can have an opinion. But if you’ve never actually used one of these tools, you don’t have authority to speak on them. Those are two different things.
Clarity Is the Point. Confusion Is the Problem.
Here’s why I care so much about tactile clarity in training. Confusion creates stress. Stress creates frustration — in the dog and in the handler. And when the handler gets frustrated, the relationship starts to break down. That has nothing to do with a tool being good or bad. That’s just what happens when communication breaks down.
A remote collar, used correctly, gives me the ability to communicate with a dog at 100 yards, 200 yards, 300 yards, with the same clarity as if they were standing right next to me. Once the dog understands what the tactile signal means — and once they know that responding to it brings relief and reward — learning happens fast. Problems that used to take weeks get resolved in days.
Some people call that lazy. Some people call it cheating. I call it being productive. I call it respecting the fact that I only have so much time with this dog, and I want us to get to the good part as quickly as possible. I want them to be safe. I want them to have a life. I want us to enjoy each other.
Using a tool that accelerates that process isn’t a shortcut. It’s a better path.
Dogs Are Paying the Price for This Fight
This is the part that really gets me. Because at the end of all this debate, all this emotion, all this posturing — the dogs are the ones losing.
Dogs are being put down that didn’t need to be. Dogs are being put on two, three anti-anxiety medications before anyone has tried adjusting their diet, increasing their exercise, building their confidence, or teaching them self-control. And yet, if a trainer suggests a remote collar in the same conversation, suddenly they’re the villain.
I’ve been in the pharmaceutical industry. I understand how that system works. And I’m not saying medication is never appropriate. But it shouldn’t be the first step. It shouldn’t come before training. And the fact that “give the dog a pill” is considered more humane than “teach the dog with a tactile tool” is something that I genuinely cannot wrap my head around.
I organized a community event once — a pack walk to raise money for dogs. And the question came up: should we allow remote collars and prong collars at the event? Because some people wanted to ban them. And I thought — if you’re so focused on the tool that you’re willing to exclude dog owners who need those tools to safely manage their dogs at a community event, then you’re not actually focused on the dogs. You’re focused on your feelings about a piece of equipment.
My Invitation Stands
I have extended this invitation for years, and I’m extending it again here. If you are a veterinarian, an animal behaviorist, or a canine professional who has concerns about these tools — come watch. Come observe a real session. Not a YouTube clip, not a secondhand story. Come and see what it actually looks like when a remote collar or a prong collar is used with intention, skill, and care for the dog.
I’m not asking you to agree with me. I’m asking you to look at the truth before you form your verdict. Because that’s what a growth mindset requires. That’s what your dogs deserve.
Nobody has taken me up on it yet from that side of the fence. But the door is open. It always will be.
The Bottom Line
If you take nothing else from this, take this:
- No tool is inhumane. Only the person using it can be.
- A remote collar at the right level is often gentler than your phone vibrating in your pocket.
- The debate exists because of fear, ignorance, peer pressure, and business interests — not because of evidence.
- Clarity in communication reduces confusion, reduces stress, and builds a better relationship between you and your dog.
- Dogs are suffering because we’re arguing about tools instead of educating people.
- The answer is always more education, more understanding, and less judgment.
If you’re a trainer or canine professional navigating these debates, know that you’re not alone. You don’t have to argue. Just show up, educate the people who need you, and keep going. That’s what community is for — and that’s what UPX is built on.
Find me at dukeferguson.com or unleashpotential.ca — and if you heard this on The Weekly Recall, reach out and let me know. That’s exactly why I do this


